Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance memory mapped devices esil support #161

Open
radare opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

enhance memory mapped devices esil support #161

radare opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@radare
Copy link

radare commented Mar 27, 2017

Everytime the esil.mdev callback is executed we get the address of memory that is accessed and if the operation is READ or WRITE. but mdev need another 3rd parameter that specifies the value that is written in this address (which can be byte, word, dword,...).

otherwise we cant emulate hw devices

@gordon-quad
Copy link

any news on that?

@radare
Copy link
Author

radare commented Nov 9, 2018 via email

@gordon-quad
Copy link

Is it still considered as "good first issue"?
Peeking at the code it looks quite a straightforward change, I am just not sure if changing number of arguments for cmd_mdev requires changes outside esil.c.

@ret2libc
Copy link

This issue has been moved from radareorg/radare2 to radareorg/ideas as we are trying to clean our backlog and this issue has probably been created a long while ago. This is an effort to help contributors understand what are the actionable items they can work on, prioritize issues better and help users find active/duplicated issues more easily. If this is not an enhancement/improvement/general idea but a bug, feel free to ask for re-transfer to main repo. Thanks for your understanding and contribution with this issue.

@ret2libc ret2libc transferred this issue from radareorg/radare2 Jun 23, 2020
@XVilka XVilka added the ESIL label Jul 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants