-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lineshape issues at low pressure with DIT min-RMS #421
Comments
The temporary fix can be a good first issue for newcomers! |
This also happened in #186 (comment) Even after all corrections, the optimized weights do this at too narrow widths. My preference would be to make the simple weights default, they are more reliable if a little less accurate, but you can compensate by increasing width grid resolution |
@anandxkumar already done in #422 :) |
Hi @erwanp, is this issue still open if yes then I'd like to contribute and can you please tell me how can I do so I mean I know basic python but I am ready to learn anything that will be required here. Thank you |
Hello @ishumi007, thanks for showing interest in the issue. Erwan actually created a Pull request regarding the same, so I would suggest you look into other issues and let us know if you need any help regarding it :) |
馃悰 Describe the bug
For very narrow broadening (typically mbar), the lineshape obtained with min-RMS weights of the DIT algorithm ( #116 ) give wrong lineshape.
This happens both with FFT and Analytical Voigt.
馃枼 Steps To Reproduce
Analytical Voigt :
FFT :
馃挕 Possible solutions
Fix coefficients @dcmvdbekerom ?
in the meantime :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: