Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Naik <pratiknaik@gmail.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
3 additions
and
3 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2e0765a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now we have to go and change our code back to expecting a 1-based index. ::sigh::
2e0765a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sigh? It’s fixed, man — rejoice!!
2e0765a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing this, I got flustered when I read that the 1-based index was desired behavior*. From the changes here, it looks as if this was an unintended bug after all?
- http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/154897