Accept columns passed with options in remove_index #37168
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before this patch, column names could only be passed as a positional
argument when no other options were supplied:
remove_index :reports, :report_id
Passing column names positionally along with other options would fail:
remove_index :reports, :report_id, unique: true
# => ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 3, expected 1..2)
koic
added a commit
to koic/oracle-enhanced
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2019
Resolves rsim#1929. Follow rails/rails#37168.
kamipo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2020
#37168 is not backported to 6-0-stable. [ci skip]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this patch, column names could only be passed as a positional argument when no other options were supplied:
Passing column names positionally along with other options would fail:
This inconsistency was noted before in #29432.