fixed comment for example sql statement

[jetjodh]

Motivation / Background

This Pull Request has been created because fixes #47903

Detail

This Pull Request changes example SQL statement to be more coherent to the user.

Additional information

Checklist

Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

• This Pull Request is related to one change. Changes that are unrelated should be opened in separate PRs.
• Commit message has a detailed description of what changed and why. If this PR fixes a related issue include it in the commit message. Ex: [Fix #issue-number]
• Tests are added or updated if you fix a bug or add a feature.
• CHANGELOG files are updated for the changed libraries if there is a behavior change or additional feature. Minor bug fixes and documentation changes should not be included.

[vipulnsward]

The current example is correct. For example-

> User.joins(:devices).ids
=> User Pluck (3.5ms)  SELECT "users"."id" FROM "users" INNER JOIN "devices" ON "devices"."user_id" = "users"."id"

Did this produce a different response for you?

[zzak]

@vipulnsward Either is "correct", it depends on the association right? In this case saying "this person belongs to this company" is more natural than "this company belongs to this person", IMO. I guess the reference could be a table of CEOs!

[zzak]

I think here is another good example, ignoring the second join:

rails/guides/source/active_record_querying.md

Lines 1346 to 1354 in 3859037

	```ruby
	Book.joins(:author, :reviews)
	```
	This produces:
	```sql
	SELECT books.* FROM books
	INNER JOIN authors ON authors.id = books.author_id

[vipulnsward]

Sounds good, I generally go with the generated console output instead of what looks better, since many open PRs sometimes saying its wrong.

[zzak]

Sounds good, I generally go with the generated console output instead of what looks better, since many open PRs sometimes saying its wrong.

In this case the output is generated from models we don't actually have access to the full schema though, right? So we're kind of making things up as we go.