Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove assets.enabled from Configuring guide #44525

Conversation

etiennebarrie
Copy link
Contributor

The option was removed in #18636 and didn't make the cut to the gem (since loading the gem enables the asset pipeline).

Summary

Removes a nonexistent configuration option from the Configuring guide.

Other Information

Should we remove the whole assets section since it's optional now? The configuration options are well documented in the gem itself so we could point there.

The option was removed in rails#18636 and
didn't make the cut to the gem (since loading the gem enables the asset
pipeline).
@rails-bot rails-bot bot added the docs label Feb 23, 2022
@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner merged commit 19f8d03 into rails:main Feb 23, 2022
@jonathanhefner
Copy link
Member

jonathanhefner commented Feb 23, 2022

Thank you, @etiennebarrie!

(Just to clarify, this was also removed from sprockets-rails: rails/sprockets-rails#58 (comment).)

Should we remove the whole assets section since it's optional now? The configuration options are well documented in the gem itself so we could point there.

Rails changes the default value of one of these options, and it is possible that we may change others in the future. I think it would be good to keep this section, so that we have a place to document such default values.

(Backported to 7-0-stable in 08c90ed.)

jonathanhefner added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2022
…om-configuring-guide

Remove assets.enabled from Configuring guide [ci-skip]

(cherry picked from commit 19f8d03)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants