New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
railsapi.com out of date #29
Comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 I can't live without :'( |
+1 |
+1, its such a great tool to have when i'm offline (which is all the time)!! |
+1 how can we help? |
how is this different from http://api.rubyonrails.org/ |
I find that railsapi does two things that http:/api.rubyonrails.org doesn't.
|
@lukeholder It mixes ruby API and rails API together |
ooops.. yeah sorry duh. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Mikhail Dieterle <
Luke Holder (+1) 425 647 5710 |
For those that want them... http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23115266/railsapi/rails-v3.1.3.zip Generated using ruby 1.9.3, sdoc v0.3.16, and a command similar to this: RDOCOPT="--main rails-v3.2.1/README.rdoc" sdoc -x test -x example -x bin -N --title "Rails v3.2.1" --op ~/Desktop/rails-v3.2.1 rails-v3.2.1 |
@pankajso thanks a lot |
Thank you! |
Thanks! |
It would be nice if railsapi.com was a community asset. The "build your own package" feature is awesome (especially when you can combine ruby and rails apis) but unfortunately the site is not maintained. Why is that? |
More interest than I thought... I generated ruby 1.9.3-p125 docs as well... http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23115266/railsapi/ruby-1.9.3p125.zip |
@phallstrom Any chance you could produce a combined ruby 1.9.2 and rails 3.2 bundle? Thanks in advance! |
1.9.2 or 1.9.3 ? On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Lee Smith wrote:
|
@phallstrom 1.9.2 |
Not merged, but here's ruby 1.9.2-p290 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23115266/railsapi/ruby-1.9.2p290.zip On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Lee Smith wrote:
|
Maybe it will help — some time ago I created doc gem for building searchable documentation for any number of version of ruby, rails, gems and other libs and gem uses sdoc. Building takes longer then downloading, but then you can customize whatever you want. |
Thanks @phallstrom, very helpful! Does anyone know how to merge them so that you get the little colored 'ruby' or 'rails' prefixes before the class name? I thought |
Rails 3.2.2 docs http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23115266/railsapi/rails-v3.2.2.zip |
+1, when you need it, you need it. |
Hey everyone, I'm going to be helping out with the sdoc repo and railsapi.com maintenance. Closing this issue for now, hope to get Rails 3.2.8 and Ruby 1.9.3 up on railsapi.com soon |
@ndbroadbent How's the maintenance going? Some fresh api docs would be awesome. |
@ndbroadbent Would be great to get Ruby 1.9.3 or even 2.0.0 and a current version of Rails 3.2 online... thanks for your effort! |
Maybe @phallstrom can come through for us again. :) |
I really should write up what I do, but I'm lazy right now... Rails is 0.0.1 out of date, but close enough. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/23115266/railsapi/Rails%203.2.12.zip |
Great, thanks! Is it possible to generate a combined version of Ruby and Rails, like http://railsapi.com/doc/rails-v3.2.6_ruby-v1.9.2/ ? |
Mucho gracias @phallstrom! A gist on how you do this would be awesome too. Thanks again! 🤘 |
@leesmith Here's how to build them yourself. http://pjkh.com/articles/building-your-own-rails-and-ruby-searchable-api-docs/ @manuelmeurer I think it's possible to combine them, but I don't like them that way so haven't figured out how to do it. |
That's awesome. Thanks man! |
Awesomeness, thanks @phallstrom! Combining them is really easy using
|
Thanks @manuelmeurer I added it to the article and mentioned you. If you'd rather your name wasn't on there let me know and I'll take it off. |
No problem with my name on there, I took the command directly from the README though... |
Please add Rails 3.1.1 to railsapi.com, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: