Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixup for release #3763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 8, 2014
Merged

Fixup for release #3763

merged 1 commit into from Sep 8, 2014

Conversation

todb-r7
Copy link

@todb-r7 todb-r7 commented Sep 8, 2014

Ack, a missing disclosure date on the GDB exploit. I'm deferring to the
PR itself for this as the disclosure and URL reference.

/cc @wvu-r7 @cdoughty-r7 this needs to land to solve the msftidy error at least.

Ack, a missing disclosure date on the GDB exploit. I'm deferring to the
PR itself for this as the disclosure and URL reference.
wvu added a commit to wvu/metasploit-framework that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2014
@wvu wvu merged commit 4abee39 into rapid7:master Sep 8, 2014
@todb-r7
Copy link
Author

todb-r7 commented Sep 8, 2014

The msftidy error was introduced in PR #3691. Naughty @wvu-r7, set up your commit hooks.

@todb-r7 todb-r7 deleted the fixup-release branch September 8, 2014 19:04
@wvu
Copy link
Contributor

wvu commented Sep 8, 2014

Doh! Recloned and forgot to set up the hooks.

@todb-r7
Copy link
Author

todb-r7 commented Sep 8, 2014

to be fair, @jvennix-r7 should have the hooks as well.

and travis should start failing PRs that fail msftidy soon, just as soon as I get the Redmine thing under control.

@@ -14,13 +14,18 @@ def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'GDB Server Remote Payload Execution',
'Description' => %q{
This module attempts to execute an arbitrary payload on a gdbserver service.
This module attempts to execute an arbitrary payload on a loose gdbserver service.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not a bug. It's a feature.

@todb-r7 todb-r7 added the module label Sep 8, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants