-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 667
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for PPID spoofing #374
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why cast this larger object to a smaller contained object rather than pass the smaller contained object in itself? To be more specific, why use this:
(STARTUPINFOA*)&si
When you're effectively passing in this:
si.StartupInfo
?
It will work because the first object in the
STARTUPINFOEXA
object is aSTARTUPINFOA
object, but it would seem to be better and more clear to just pass in theSTARTUPINFOA
object itself? Or am I missing something?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the manually declared
_STARTUPINFOEXA
extends the existingSTARTUPINFOEXA
by addingLPPROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_LIST lpAttributeList
since it's not available on win xp.when i wrote the code, i thought to make explicit the fact that the struct is effectively casted down to
STARTUPINFOA
, but it gets interpreted asSTARTUPINFOEXA
when the flagEXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT
is specified.it will work in both ways, maybe
si.StartupInfo
is more clear, but since theCreateProcess
function can potentially access data outsidesi.StartupInfo
i preferred to use an explicit cast. feel free to send a PR with the proposed change. 👍There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies for the long delay...
Wow.... I did not know about the
EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT
attribute bit. That's.... uh... certainly one way to overload a method, and I'm a little sad that's the route MS took on it. In light of that, what you have makes perfect sense, though it's necessity makes me sad.