-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bcm2708_fb: bcm2708_fb_debugfs_init() is called twice. #521
Comments
popcornmix
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2014
Removed in 4127b11 Thanks for heads up. |
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 4, 2017
Now that Ext4 and f2fs filesystems support encrypted directories and files, attempts to access those files may return ENOKEY, resulting in the following WARNING. Map ENOKEY to nfserr_perm instead of nfserr_io. [ 1295.411759] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1295.411787] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12786 at fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:796 nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.411806] nfsd: non-standard errno: -126 [ 1295.411816] Modules linked in: nfsd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd fscache tun bridge stp llc fuse ip_set nfnetlink vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_generic crc32_pclmul snd_ens1371 gameport ghash_clmulni_intel snd_ac97_codec f2fs intel_rapl_perf ac97_bus snd_seq ppdev snd_pcm snd_rawmidi snd_timer vmw_balloon snd_seq_device snd joydev soundcore parport_pc parport nfit acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis vmw_vmci tpm_tis_core tpm shpchp i2c_piix4 grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm crc32c_intel e1000 mptspi scsi_transport_spi serio_raw mptscsih mptbase ata_generic pata_acpi fjes [last unloaded: nfs_acl] [ 1295.412522] CPU: 0 PID: 12786 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G W 4.11.0-rc1+ #521 [ 1295.412959] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015 [ 1295.413814] Call Trace: [ 1295.414252] dump_stack+0x63/0x86 [ 1295.414666] __warn+0xcb/0xf0 [ 1295.415087] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 [ 1295.415502] ? put_filp+0x42/0x50 [ 1295.415927] nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.416339] nfsd_open+0xd7/0x180 [nfsd] [ 1295.416746] nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x367/0x3c0 [nfsd] [ 1295.417182] ? security_inode_permission+0x41/0x60 [ 1295.417591] nfsd4_process_open2+0x9b2/0x1200 [nfsd] [ 1295.418007] nfsd4_open+0x481/0x790 [nfsd] [ 1295.418409] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x395/0x680 [nfsd] [ 1295.418812] nfsd_dispatch+0xb8/0x1f0 [nfsd] [ 1295.419233] svc_process_common+0x4d9/0x830 [sunrpc] [ 1295.419631] svc_process+0xfe/0x1b0 [sunrpc] [ 1295.420033] nfsd+0xe9/0x150 [nfsd] [ 1295.420420] kthread+0x101/0x140 [ 1295.420802] ? nfsd_destroy+0x60/0x60 [nfsd] [ 1295.421199] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 1295.421598] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1295.421996] ---[ end trace 0d5a969cd7852e1f ]--- Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2017
commit c952cd4 upstream. Now that Ext4 and f2fs filesystems support encrypted directories and files, attempts to access those files may return ENOKEY, resulting in the following WARNING. Map ENOKEY to nfserr_perm instead of nfserr_io. [ 1295.411759] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1295.411787] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12786 at fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:796 nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.411806] nfsd: non-standard errno: -126 [ 1295.411816] Modules linked in: nfsd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd fscache tun bridge stp llc fuse ip_set nfnetlink vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_generic crc32_pclmul snd_ens1371 gameport ghash_clmulni_intel snd_ac97_codec f2fs intel_rapl_perf ac97_bus snd_seq ppdev snd_pcm snd_rawmidi snd_timer vmw_balloon snd_seq_device snd joydev soundcore parport_pc parport nfit acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis vmw_vmci tpm_tis_core tpm shpchp i2c_piix4 grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm crc32c_intel e1000 mptspi scsi_transport_spi serio_raw mptscsih mptbase ata_generic pata_acpi fjes [last unloaded: nfs_acl] [ 1295.412522] CPU: 0 PID: 12786 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G W 4.11.0-rc1+ #521 [ 1295.412959] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015 [ 1295.413814] Call Trace: [ 1295.414252] dump_stack+0x63/0x86 [ 1295.414666] __warn+0xcb/0xf0 [ 1295.415087] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 [ 1295.415502] ? put_filp+0x42/0x50 [ 1295.415927] nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.416339] nfsd_open+0xd7/0x180 [nfsd] [ 1295.416746] nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x367/0x3c0 [nfsd] [ 1295.417182] ? security_inode_permission+0x41/0x60 [ 1295.417591] nfsd4_process_open2+0x9b2/0x1200 [nfsd] [ 1295.418007] nfsd4_open+0x481/0x790 [nfsd] [ 1295.418409] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x395/0x680 [nfsd] [ 1295.418812] nfsd_dispatch+0xb8/0x1f0 [nfsd] [ 1295.419233] svc_process_common+0x4d9/0x830 [sunrpc] [ 1295.419631] svc_process+0xfe/0x1b0 [sunrpc] [ 1295.420033] nfsd+0xe9/0x150 [nfsd] [ 1295.420420] kthread+0x101/0x140 [ 1295.420802] ? nfsd_destroy+0x60/0x60 [nfsd] [ 1295.421199] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 1295.421598] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1295.421996] ---[ end trace 0d5a969cd7852e1f ]--- Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2017
commit c952cd4 upstream. Now that Ext4 and f2fs filesystems support encrypted directories and files, attempts to access those files may return ENOKEY, resulting in the following WARNING. Map ENOKEY to nfserr_perm instead of nfserr_io. [ 1295.411759] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1295.411787] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12786 at fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:796 nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.411806] nfsd: non-standard errno: -126 [ 1295.411816] Modules linked in: nfsd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd fscache tun bridge stp llc fuse ip_set nfnetlink vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_generic crc32_pclmul snd_ens1371 gameport ghash_clmulni_intel snd_ac97_codec f2fs intel_rapl_perf ac97_bus snd_seq ppdev snd_pcm snd_rawmidi snd_timer vmw_balloon snd_seq_device snd joydev soundcore parport_pc parport nfit acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis vmw_vmci tpm_tis_core tpm shpchp i2c_piix4 grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm crc32c_intel e1000 mptspi scsi_transport_spi serio_raw mptscsih mptbase ata_generic pata_acpi fjes [last unloaded: nfs_acl] [ 1295.412522] CPU: 0 PID: 12786 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G W 4.11.0-rc1+ #521 [ 1295.412959] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015 [ 1295.413814] Call Trace: [ 1295.414252] dump_stack+0x63/0x86 [ 1295.414666] __warn+0xcb/0xf0 [ 1295.415087] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 [ 1295.415502] ? put_filp+0x42/0x50 [ 1295.415927] nfserrno+0x74/0x80 [nfsd] [ 1295.416339] nfsd_open+0xd7/0x180 [nfsd] [ 1295.416746] nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x367/0x3c0 [nfsd] [ 1295.417182] ? security_inode_permission+0x41/0x60 [ 1295.417591] nfsd4_process_open2+0x9b2/0x1200 [nfsd] [ 1295.418007] nfsd4_open+0x481/0x790 [nfsd] [ 1295.418409] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x395/0x680 [nfsd] [ 1295.418812] nfsd_dispatch+0xb8/0x1f0 [nfsd] [ 1295.419233] svc_process_common+0x4d9/0x830 [sunrpc] [ 1295.419631] svc_process+0xfe/0x1b0 [sunrpc] [ 1295.420033] nfsd+0xe9/0x150 [nfsd] [ 1295.420420] kthread+0x101/0x140 [ 1295.420802] ? nfsd_destroy+0x60/0x60 [nfsd] [ 1295.421199] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 1295.421598] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1295.421996] ---[ end trace 0d5a969cd7852e1f ]--- Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2017
[ Upstream commit 332270f ] llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below: .... 440: (b7) r1 = 15 441: (05) goto pc+73 515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152) 516: (bf) r7 = r10 517: (07) r7 += -112 518: (bf) r2 = r7 519: (0f) r2 += r1 520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0) 521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1 .... and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521. This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519 where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value. Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and "stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2017
[ Upstream commit 332270f ] llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below: .... 440: (b7) r1 = 15 441: (05) goto pc+73 515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152) 516: (bf) r7 = r10 517: (07) r7 += -112 518: (bf) r2 = r7 519: (0f) r2 += r1 520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0) 521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1 .... and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521. This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519 where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value. Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and "stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2017
[ Upstream commit 332270f ] llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below: .... 440: (b7) r1 = 15 441: (05) goto pc+73 515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152) 516: (bf) r7 = r10 517: (07) r7 += -112 518: (bf) r2 = r7 519: (0f) r2 += r1 520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0) 521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1 .... and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521. This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519 where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value. Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and "stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2020
The temp buffer size variable for trace_find_next_entry() was incorrectly being updated when the size did not change. The temp buffer size should only be updated when it is reallocated. This is mostly an issue when used with ftrace_dump(). That's because ftrace_dump() can not allocate a new buffer, and instead uses a temporary buffer with a fix size. But the variable that keeps track of that size is incorrectly updated with each call, and it could fall into the path that would try to reallocate the buffer and produce a warning. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1601 at kernel/trace/trace.c:3548 trace_find_next_entry+0xd0/0xe0 Modules linked in [..] CPU: 1 PID: 1601 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-test+ #521 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016 RIP: 0010:trace_find_next_entry+0xd0/0xe0 Code: 40 21 00 00 4c 89 e1 31 d2 4c 89 ee 48 89 df e8 c6 9e ff ff 89 ab 54 21 00 00 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 48 63 d5 eb bf 31 c0 eb f0 <0f> 0b 48 63 d5 eb b4 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 53 48 8d 8f 60 21 RSP: 0018:ffff95a4f2e8bd70 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: ffffffff96679fc0 RBX: ffffffff97910de0 RCX: ffffffff96679fc0 RDX: ffff95a4f2e8bd98 RSI: ffff95a4ee321098 RDI: ffffffff97913000 RBP: 0000000000000018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: ffff95a4f2e8bd98 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff95a4ee321098 R15: 00000000009aa301 FS: 00007f8565484740(0000) GS:ffff95a55aa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055876bd43d90 CR3: 00000000b76e6003 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: trace_print_lat_context+0x58/0x2d0 ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 print_trace_line+0x1a4/0x4f0 ftrace_dump.cold+0xad/0x12c __handle_sysrq.cold+0x51/0x126 write_sysrq_trigger+0x3f/0x4a proc_reg_write+0x53/0x80 vfs_write+0xca/0x210 ksys_write+0x70/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f8565579487 Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffd40707948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f8565579487 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055876bd74de0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 000055876bd74de0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 000055876bdec280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f856564a500 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007f856564a700 irq event stamp: 109958 ---[ end trace 7aab5b7e51484b00 ]--- Not only fix the updating of the temp buffer, but also do not free the temp buffer before a new buffer is allocated (there's no reason to not continue to use the current temp buffer if an allocation fails). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 8e99cf9 ("tracing: Do not allocate buffer in trace_find_next_entry() in atomic") Reported-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2020
commit 851e6f6 upstream. The temp buffer size variable for trace_find_next_entry() was incorrectly being updated when the size did not change. The temp buffer size should only be updated when it is reallocated. This is mostly an issue when used with ftrace_dump(). That's because ftrace_dump() can not allocate a new buffer, and instead uses a temporary buffer with a fix size. But the variable that keeps track of that size is incorrectly updated with each call, and it could fall into the path that would try to reallocate the buffer and produce a warning. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1601 at kernel/trace/trace.c:3548 trace_find_next_entry+0xd0/0xe0 Modules linked in [..] CPU: 1 PID: 1601 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-test+ #521 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016 RIP: 0010:trace_find_next_entry+0xd0/0xe0 Code: 40 21 00 00 4c 89 e1 31 d2 4c 89 ee 48 89 df e8 c6 9e ff ff 89 ab 54 21 00 00 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 48 63 d5 eb bf 31 c0 eb f0 <0f> 0b 48 63 d5 eb b4 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 53 48 8d 8f 60 21 RSP: 0018:ffff95a4f2e8bd70 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: ffffffff96679fc0 RBX: ffffffff97910de0 RCX: ffffffff96679fc0 RDX: ffff95a4f2e8bd98 RSI: ffff95a4ee321098 RDI: ffffffff97913000 RBP: 0000000000000018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: ffff95a4f2e8bd98 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff95a4ee321098 R15: 00000000009aa301 FS: 00007f8565484740(0000) GS:ffff95a55aa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055876bd43d90 CR3: 00000000b76e6003 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: trace_print_lat_context+0x58/0x2d0 ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 print_trace_line+0x1a4/0x4f0 ftrace_dump.cold+0xad/0x12c __handle_sysrq.cold+0x51/0x126 write_sysrq_trigger+0x3f/0x4a proc_reg_write+0x53/0x80 vfs_write+0xca/0x210 ksys_write+0x70/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f8565579487 Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffd40707948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f8565579487 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055876bd74de0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 000055876bd74de0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 000055876bdec280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f856564a500 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007f856564a700 irq event stamp: 109958 ---[ end trace 7aab5b7e51484b00 ]--- Not only fix the updating of the temp buffer, but also do not free the temp buffer before a new buffer is allocated (there's no reason to not continue to use the current temp buffer if an allocation fails). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 8e99cf9 ("tracing: Do not allocate buffer in trace_find_next_entry() in atomic") Reported-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
[ Upstream commit 0f28be6 ] Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a domain_id: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mount/396 is trying to acquire lock: ffff907a8aaaa0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by mount/396: #0: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 #1: ffffffffc00e6f28 (erofs_domain_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x3d/0x270 [erofs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 396 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0 validate_chain+0x5c4/0xa00 __lock_acquire+0x6a9/0xd50 lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2b0 down_write_nested+0x45/0xd0 alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 sget_fc+0x62/0x2f0 vfs_get_super+0x21/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0 fc_mount+0x12/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x75/0x90 kern_mount+0x24/0x40 erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x1ef/0x270 [erofs] erofs_fc_fill_super+0x213/0x380 [erofs] This is because the file_system_type of both erofs and the pseudo-mount point of domain_id is erofs_fs_type, so two successive calls to alloc_super() are considered to be using the same lock and trigger the warning above. Therefore add a nodev file_system_type called erofs_anon_fs_type in fscache.c to silence this complaint. Because kern_mount() takes a pointer to struct file_system_type, not its (string) name. So we don't need to call register_filesystem(). In addition, call init_pseudo() in erofs_anon_init_fs_context() as suggested by Al Viro, so that we can remove erofs_fc_fill_pseudo_super(), erofs_fc_anon_get_tree(), and erofs_anon_context_ops. Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Fixes: a984956 ("erofs: introduce a pseudo mnt to manage shared cookies") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307101018.2021925-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
[ Upstream commit 0f28be6 ] Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a domain_id: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mount/396 is trying to acquire lock: ffff907a8aaaa0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by mount/396: #0: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 #1: ffffffffc00e6f28 (erofs_domain_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x3d/0x270 [erofs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 396 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0 validate_chain+0x5c4/0xa00 __lock_acquire+0x6a9/0xd50 lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2b0 down_write_nested+0x45/0xd0 alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 sget_fc+0x62/0x2f0 vfs_get_super+0x21/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0 fc_mount+0x12/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x75/0x90 kern_mount+0x24/0x40 erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x1ef/0x270 [erofs] erofs_fc_fill_super+0x213/0x380 [erofs] This is because the file_system_type of both erofs and the pseudo-mount point of domain_id is erofs_fs_type, so two successive calls to alloc_super() are considered to be using the same lock and trigger the warning above. Therefore add a nodev file_system_type called erofs_anon_fs_type in fscache.c to silence this complaint. Because kern_mount() takes a pointer to struct file_system_type, not its (string) name. So we don't need to call register_filesystem(). In addition, call init_pseudo() in erofs_anon_init_fs_context() as suggested by Al Viro, so that we can remove erofs_fc_fill_pseudo_super(), erofs_fc_anon_get_tree(), and erofs_anon_context_ops. Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Fixes: a984956 ("erofs: introduce a pseudo mnt to manage shared cookies") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307101018.2021925-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
[ Upstream commit 0f28be6 ] Lockdep reported the following issue when mounting erofs with a domain_id: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mount/396 is trying to acquire lock: ffff907a8aaaa0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); lock(&type->s_umount_key#50/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by mount/396: #0: ffff907a8aaa90e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 #1: ffffffffc00e6f28 (erofs_domain_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x3d/0x270 [erofs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 396 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-xfstests #521 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0 validate_chain+0x5c4/0xa00 __lock_acquire+0x6a9/0xd50 lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2b0 down_write_nested+0x45/0xd0 alloc_super+0xe3/0x3d0 sget_fc+0x62/0x2f0 vfs_get_super+0x21/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0 fc_mount+0x12/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x75/0x90 kern_mount+0x24/0x40 erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x1ef/0x270 [erofs] erofs_fc_fill_super+0x213/0x380 [erofs] This is because the file_system_type of both erofs and the pseudo-mount point of domain_id is erofs_fs_type, so two successive calls to alloc_super() are considered to be using the same lock and trigger the warning above. Therefore add a nodev file_system_type called erofs_anon_fs_type in fscache.c to silence this complaint. Because kern_mount() takes a pointer to struct file_system_type, not its (string) name. So we don't need to call register_filesystem(). In addition, call init_pseudo() in erofs_anon_init_fs_context() as suggested by Al Viro, so that we can remove erofs_fc_fill_pseudo_super(), erofs_fc_anon_get_tree(), and erofs_anon_context_ops. Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Fixes: a984956 ("erofs: introduce a pseudo mnt to manage shared cookies") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307101018.2021925-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 28, 2024
commit 13df4d4 upstream. We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands: mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ================================================================== The flow of issue triggering is as follows: // Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB! At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29. Add a new attr_id attr_clusters_in_group with values in the range [0, sbi->s_clusters_per_group] and declare mb_group_prealloc as that type to fix the issue. In addition avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) and reduce some useless loops. Fixes: 7e17092 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319113325.3110393-5-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2024
commit 13df4d4 upstream. We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands: mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ================================================================== The flow of issue triggering is as follows: // Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB! At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29. Add a new attr_id attr_clusters_in_group with values in the range [0, sbi->s_clusters_per_group] and declare mb_group_prealloc as that type to fix the issue. In addition avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) and reduce some useless loops. Fixes: 7e17092 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319113325.3110393-5-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello
bcm2708_fb_debugfs_init() is called twice in bcm2708_fb_probe().
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-3.10.y/drivers/video/bcm2708_fb.c#L647-L650
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: