Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execute preventDefault only on invalid in handleSubmit for progressive enhancement #11078

Conversation

@codesandbox
Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web EditorVS CodeInsiders

Open Preview

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Size Change: +84 B (0%)

Total Size: 20.5 kB

Filename Size Change
dist/index.cjs.js 10.2 kB +43 B (0%)
dist/index.umd.js 10.3 kB +41 B (0%)

compressed-size-action

@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 changed the title Execute preventDefault only on invalid Execute preventDefault only on invalid for progressive enhancement Oct 21, 2023
@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 changed the title Execute preventDefault only on invalid for progressive enhancement Execute preventDefault only on invalid in handleSubmit for progressive enhancement Oct 21, 2023
@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 force-pushed the feat/execute-preventDefault-only-on-invalid branch from c36a738 to 9b4d749 Compare October 21, 2023 10:16
@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2023 01:35
@kotarella1110
Copy link
Member Author

@bluebill1049 Please review this PR as I would like to merge it into the experiment branch.

@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 merged commit ca6e9b0 into experiment/support-server-actions Nov 10, 2023
4 of 5 checks passed
@kotarella1110 kotarella1110 deleted the feat/execute-preventDefault-only-on-invalid branch November 10, 2023 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants