Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #129 Test for HttpClient using Proxy configuration #502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2018
Merged

Conversation

violetagg
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@violetagg violetagg added this to the 0.7.12.RELEASE milestone Nov 8, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 8, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #502 into 0.7.x will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              0.7.x     #502      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.41%   68.49%   +0.08%     
- Complexity     1091     1093       +2     
============================================
  Files            73       73              
  Lines          4717     4717              
  Branches        674      674              
============================================
+ Hits           3227     3231       +4     
+ Misses         1104     1100       -4     
  Partials        386      386
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...or/ipc/netty/http/client/HttpClientOperations.java 57.17% <0%> (-0.73%) 82% <0%> (-1%)
...actor/ipc/netty/http/client/HttpClientOptions.java 88.13% <0%> (+1.69%) 25% <0%> (+1%) ⬆️
.../ipc/netty/channel/PooledClientContextHandler.java 72.41% <0%> (+5.17%) 28% <0%> (+2%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 78fb632...f8e9ec6. Read the comment docs.

@violetagg violetagg merged commit f8e9ec6 into 0.7.x Nov 9, 2018
@violetagg violetagg deleted the issue-129 branch November 9, 2018 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants