fix #850 Specify fire-and-forget dispose() behaviour for LoopResources, ConnectionProvider

[violetagg]

Specify fire-and-forget disposeLoopsAndConnections() behaviour for
TcpResources, HttpResources
Specify fire-and-forget shutdown() behaviour for UdpResources

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #851 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #851      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     67.47%   67.54%   +0.06%     
- Complexity     1466     1467       +1     
============================================
  Files           138      138              
  Lines          6829     6827       -2     
  Branches        871      871              
============================================
+ Hits           4608     4611       +3     
+ Misses         1754     1750       -4     
+ Partials        467      466       -1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
src/main/java/reactor/netty/udp/UdpResources.java	32.69% <ø> (+1.21%)	8 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...rc/main/java/reactor/netty/http/HttpResources.java	47.36% <ø> (ø)	5 <0> (ø)	⬇️
src/main/java/reactor/netty/tcp/TcpResources.java	57.14% <0%> (ø)	26 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...va/reactor/netty/resources/ConnectionProvider.java	75.67% <0%> (ø)	17 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...in/java/reactor/netty/resources/LoopResources.java	32.25% <0%> (ø)	9 <0> (ø)	⬇️
.../java/reactor/netty/channel/ChannelOperations.java	92.74% <0%> (-0.81%)	59% <0%> (-1%)
...c/main/java/reactor/netty/channel/FluxReceive.java	78.15% <0%> (+0.48%)	63% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
...eactor/netty/http/client/HttpClientOperations.java	65.1% <0%> (+0.87%)	72% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 24cc539...27e95c3. Read the comment docs.

[simonbasle]

I would mention combining disposeLater with blocking in these new docs, since otherwise it might lead people to think simply replacing dispose() with disposeLater() would work

[violetagg]

I would mention combining disposeLater with blocking in these new docs, since otherwise it might lead people to think simply replacing dispose() with disposeLater() would work

done