Enable listeners on RealmList #4216
Conversation
- Add RealmObservable and RealmCollectionObservable interfaces. - Enable detailed change information for RealmResults through OrderedCollectionChange interface. - Fix a bug in the ObserverPairList which could cause the removed listener gets called if it was removed during previous listener iteration. Fix #989
The listeners should be check by equality.
beeender
force-pushed
the
mc/realm-list-listener
branch
from
8711b2a
to
1b6e24e
Compare
|
I is quite difficult for me to make all the |
The RealmList holds a Collection which is used for listeners. Other RealmList APIs are still calling from LinkView.
beeender
force-pushed
the
mc/realm-list-listener
branch
from
1b6e24e
to
bca646f
Compare
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| @RunTestInLooperThread | ||
| public void removeALlChangeListeners() { |
| @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| /** | |||
| * General implementation for {@link OrderedRealmCollection} which is based on the {@code Collection}. | |||
| * Currently only {@link RealmResults} and {@link OrderedRealmCollectionSnapshot} extend this class. But | |||
| * {@link RealmList} could also extend this to share the same iterator implementation. | |||
| * Currently only {@link RealmResults} and {@link OrderedRealmCollectionSnapshot} extend this class. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any value in this line at all?
| */ | ||
| @Override | ||
| public void removeAllChangeListeners() { | ||
| realm.checkIfValid(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would be nice if this could be incorporated into the checkForAddRemoveListener method? Perhaps checkForAddRemoveListener(listener, checkForNull) ?
| @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| * Added support for sorting by link's field (#672). | |||
| * Added `OrderedRealmCollectionSnapshot` class and `OrderedRealmCollection.createSnapshot()` method. `OrderedRealmCollectionSnapshot` is useful when changing `RealmResults` or `RealmList` in simple loops. | |||
| * Added support for adding listeners on `RealmList`. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What happens with the iterators?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RealmList's iterators stay the same. They have quite different meanings compared with RealmResults. e.g.: RealmList is actually mutable for users, but RealmResults is not.
beeender
changed the base branch from
mc/fine-grained-notification
to
master
| realm.commitTransaction(); | ||
|
|
||
| collection.removeChangeListener(listener1); | ||
| collection.removeChangeListener(listener2); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should keep at least one listener in order to make sure that removeChangeListener does not remove all listeners.
| @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ public Collection(SharedRealm sharedRealm, LinkView linkView, SortDescriptor sor | |||
| this.context = sharedRealm.context; | |||
| this.table = linkView.getTable(); | |||
| this.context.addReference(this); | |||
| this.loaded = true; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should not initialize loaded field twice.
private boolean loaded = false; should be private boolean loaded; and assign value in each constructor.
The RealmList holds a Collection which is used for listeners.
Other RealmList APIs are still calling from LinkView.