Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v23.3.x] [CORE-2161] cloud_storage/topic_manifest: force negative retention to mean infinite retention #18242

Conversation

vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport of PR #17461

infinite retention.

this mirrors what's done for retention_bytes. the reasoning is that if
somebody performs a manual edit of the topic manifest and writes
"rentetion_duration" : -1, it's probably done to mirror the retention.ms
semantic of meaning infinite retention

this a followup on
redpanda-data#14355 (comment)

(cherry picked from commit 65d1204)
@vbotbuildovich vbotbuildovich added this to the v23.3.x-next milestone May 3, 2024
@vbotbuildovich vbotbuildovich added the kind/backport PRs targeting a stable branch label May 3, 2024
@piyushredpanda piyushredpanda modified the milestones: v23.3.x-next, v23.3.15 May 3, 2024
@piyushredpanda
Copy link
Contributor

Known scrubber failure.

@piyushredpanda piyushredpanda merged commit e9702a6 into redpanda-data:v23.3.x May 3, 2024
14 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/redpanda kind/backport PRs targeting a stable branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants