Use JUnit @Rule instead of (as well as) ClientDriverUnitTest

[mjg123]

Is this possible?

[neilprosser]

@mjg123 - take a look at that first attempt and let me know what you think.

c52387d#diff-1 has examples of success and failure as actual JUnit tests.

[mjg123]

I know it's closed now, but I'm using this for the first time. I feel that if .expect() is correct for the rule then .expect should be the method on the clientdriver as well (currently is .addExpectation() )

[neilprosser]

I wanted to be careful not to confuse with a method name that potentially indicates overwriting the expectation. ExpectedException can only expect one exception. Expecting one over the top of another expects the last one.

[neilprosser]

Have now corrected the method name to what I said it was rather than what it actually was!