[RESTEASY-3490] Allow default methods on proxy clients to be used #4125
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fjuma
reviewed
Apr 4, 2024
resteasy-client/src/main/java/org/jboss/resteasy/client/jaxrs/internal/proxy/ClientProxy.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
stevenschlansker
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2024
resteasy-client/src/main/java/org/jboss/resteasy/client/jaxrs/internal/proxy/ClientProxy.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
If possible, we would appreciate a backport to 6.2 |
|
Thank you for the review. I'll double check the exception handling and I'll definitely backport this to 6.2 once we have a final version of it. |
…ing with RESTEASY004530
…. Add tests to ensure default proxy methods work in the container and with parameters. Signed-off-by: James R. Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RESTEASY-3490
@stevenschlansker does this seems okay to you?