New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/switch to rhino #535
Conversation
fdb47e1
to
6b4a7cb
Compare
Since you needed to adapt a test, is there any other compatibility problems with rhino?
|
6b4a7cb
to
a12ff93
Compare
As I mentioned in the description it seems like recheck-web is working proper. The ignore file works also. Regarding this stackoverflow post, a simple cast does also work like: |
b100ef7
to
934e703
Compare
So, too me it looks like this variant is superior to #527. Any objections against merging and testing it during dev and especially when releasing 1.8.0? |
I am also in favor of merging now and testing throughout the sprint. |
934e703
to
b418962
Compare
7c3c566
to
b6ff4e9
Compare
124d80b
to
47fadc9
Compare
b1596cf
to
524285e
Compare
524285e
to
02a879e
Compare
There's almost no difference in size regarding the recheck-web jars.
All IT-Test in recheck-web seem to work as before.
resolves #331