-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have cipher folder path registered with the system start with gocryptfs@ #73
Comments
I understand the issue on Mac, but I don't understand where "encfs@" comes from on Linux. Which EncFS version are you using?
|
You have to manually pass a few options to fuse for the entry to show up. I wanted the feature in cryfs and i proposed the additions in that project here: cryfs/cryfs@002dc6c#diff-ae4cbf05f3651de86efe25f065c26455R29 In my project,i force encfs to behave the way i want by passing relevant options as seen here: https://github.com/mhogomchungu/sirikali/blob/4de192205c1b56d1e07b7e6080a83880ee202857/src/siritask.cpp#L238 I am using encfs version 1.7.4 but neither the version of encfs nor encfs itself matters as i think the discussed feature is a feature of fuse. |
I see. Would adding support for "-o fsname=" be enough? |
I have no problem with manually setting them but it will be nice if it happens automatically. Next version of SiriKali will add support for OS X and i want it to be ready when your project offers official support for that platform. Currently,gocryptfs volumes simply do not show up because SiriKali can not get their volume type from output of mount command on OS X. |
As this is not needed in Linux, I'd rather not always add it. I have added the option equivalent to libfuse's in de200aa . |
It works. |
Looking at below output of mount and you will see that all fuse based volumes have their cipher folder paths starting with project name followed by "@" and then cipher folder path.
This is important because on a mac,the file system of these fuse based volumes is reported as "osxfuse" and it becomes impossible to distinguish these volumes.
mount command output on a mac looks like below
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: