-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nanomsg support #53
Comments
On 4/7/14 12:04 AM, romix wrote:
Hell, I clearly haven't been paying attention. Yeah. This is exactly ZeroMQ is already out of Shine anyway (the bindings are in a separate Thanks for this. |
You're welcome! :-) |
Initial support for nanomsg is in and integrated into the event loop. So nanomsg sockets can be mixed with regular sockets, and fibers as well as threads and nothing should block. |
Cool! Thanks! But it does not build for me:
|
On 4/7/14 9:23 PM, romix wrote:
Try now? |
Yep. Works :-) |
forgot to push earlier :( |
notice that it does require to be compiled with -fPIC, or shine doesn't build
I had to patch
to fix that.
|
I've bumped nanomsg submodule in master and it doesn't seem to be a problem on my ubuntu VM. Could you check if this patch is still needed? |
will do. is there any nanomsg sample btw? |
cloned afresh. still
|
is needed, seems. |
Richard,
You've experimented with ZeroMQ already. May be nanomsg could be used instead of ZeroMQ?
nanomsg claims to be nextgen ZeroMQ, fully POSIX API compliant, faster, written in C, MIT-licensed. And there are a few Lua bindings available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: