Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add params needed for the estimation of evidence in experiment #80

Closed
richelbilderbeek opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Add params needed for the estimation of evidence in experiment #80

richelbilderbeek opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@richelbilderbeek
Labels
high priority Do this first
Projects
v1.2

Comments

@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner

richelbilderbeek commented Feb 4, 2019 •
edited
Loading

For the estimation of the evidence, one needs additionally:

  • est_evidence_mcmc must be a Nested Sampling MCMC
  • beast2_bin_path must be to BEAST2 binary

overview
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek self-assigned this Feb 4, 2019
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek added the high priority Do this first label Feb 4, 2019
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek added this to To do in v1.2 via automation Feb 4, 2019
This was referenced Feb 4, 2019
Closed
Closed
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek moved this from To do to In progress in v1.2 Feb 4, 2019
richelbilderbeek pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
Adapt doc to #80
b74ff21
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek changed the title Seperate BEAST2 options params in experiment Add params needed for the estimation of evidence in experiment Feb 4, 2019
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Owner Author

Appears done, will maybe re-open tomorrow...

v1.2 automation moved this from In progress to Done Feb 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek

Labels
high priority Do this first
Projects
v1.2
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@richelbilderbeek