Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scope section #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2023
Merged

Add scope section #89

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2023

Conversation

kito-cheng
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the scope of this document, my expection to this document can become kind of offical RISC-V standard Assembly manual, but this doucment apparently still need lots polish...

So limited the scope to the open source toolchain for GNU and LLVM compiler.

@kito-cheng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cmuellner @asb @aswaterman

@aswaterman
Copy link
Contributor

It's fine with me, but I think we could take a firmer stance that this is the officially endorsed RISC-V assembly language (even though other RISC-V assembly dialects may still exist). If we all agree with that, then we could write something like this:

This document aims to provide guidance to assembly programmers targeting the standard RISC-V assembly language, which common open-source assemblers like GNU as and LLVM's assembler support. Other assemblers might not support the same directives or pseudoinstructions; their dialects are outside the scope of this document.

Describe the scope of this document, my expection to this document can
become kind of offical RISC-V standard Assembly manual, but this
doucment apparently still need lots polish...

So limited the scope to the open source toolchain for GNU and LLVM
compiler.
@kito-cheng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@aswaterman updated :) hope we can have more resource to improving this document in the future.

@kito-cheng kito-cheng merged commit f8cd7ef into riscv-non-isa:master May 31, 2023
@kito-cheng kito-cheng deleted the scope branch May 31, 2023 00:49
@asb
Copy link
Contributor

asb commented May 31, 2023

Belated LGTM - thanks Kito.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants