refactor(storage): do not aware of keyspace in state table

[BugenZhao]

Signed-off-by: Bugen Zhao i@bugenzhao.com

What's changed and what's your intention?

With the prefixed_range introduced in #3217, we can make the cell-based table & state table not aware of keyspace prefix with ease.

Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

• Close storage: make state table not aware of the keyspace prefix #3212

[xxchan]

make Keyspace::prefixed_key private?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3239 (fd3f1de) into main (33c717c) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 78.94%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3239      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.18%   73.22%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         745      745              
  Lines      101845   101783      -62     
==========================================
- Hits        74540    74532       -8     
+ Misses      27305    27251      -54     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	73.22% <78.94%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/storage/src/table/cell_based_table.rs	75.95% <33.33%> (+5.45%)	⬆️
src/storage/src/table/state_table.rs	93.70% <92.30%> (+5.11%)	⬆️
src/storage/src/keyspace.rs	85.86% <93.75%> (-3.83%)	⬇️
src/storage/hummock_sdk/src/key.rs	84.89% <100.00%> (+10.79%)	⬆️
src/common/src/types/ordered_float.rs	24.90% <0.00%> (+0.19%)	⬆️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[wcy-fdu]

May conflict with #3238.

[lmatz]

🙇‍♂️

[xxchan]

look much better!

[BugenZhao]

make Keyspace::prefixed_key private?

We're still using it in write_batch.rs. Maybe we can make this a submodule of keyspace so that we can make it private.