We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The RzAnalysisBaseType API designed in last year's gsoc is the only way that the base types should be accessed:
RzAnalysisBaseType
rizin/librz/include/rz_analysis.h
Lines 2124 to 2130 in 486ed69
Currently there may be some accesses that still access the sdb directly and there are some other functions here:
rizin/librz/include/rz_util/rz_ctypes.h
Lines 21 to 34 in 486ed69
As explained in the end of the description in #369, it might be helpful to do this partially in parallel with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this one can be closed, since all sdb_types accesses are already isolated in RzTypes and now are part of the #371 and #275
sdb_types
RzTypes
Sorry, something went wrong.
XVilka
No branches or pull requests
The
RzAnalysisBaseType
API designed in last year's gsoc is the only way that the base types should be accessed:rizin/librz/include/rz_analysis.h
Lines 2124 to 2130 in 486ed69
Currently there may be some accesses that still access the sdb directly and there are some other functions here:
rizin/librz/include/rz_util/rz_ctypes.h
Lines 21 to 34 in 486ed69
All such cases shall be refactored to use only the new api above to completely abstract them away from sdb.
As explained in the end of the description in #369, it might be helpful to do this partially in parallel with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: