Skip to content
This repository

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with HTTPS or Subversion.

Download ZIP

mixin hijinks — enable and disable mixins

branch: master

Fetching latest commit…

Octocat-spinner-32-eaf2f5

Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time

Octocat-spinner-32 ext
Octocat-spinner-32 lib
Octocat-spinner-32 test
Octocat-spinner-32 .gitignore
Octocat-spinner-32 COPYING
Octocat-spinner-32 README
Octocat-spinner-32 Rakefile
Octocat-spinner-32 mixico.gemspec
Octocat-spinner-32 setup.rb
README
% mixico %
disable and re-enable mixins for ruby.

% quick summary %
there's no way i'm keeping this short.  i'm sorry, but you're going to
have to really read this once.

% installation %
with gem:
  $ gem install mixico 

without:
  $ ruby setup.rb config
  $ ruby setup.rb setup
  $ sudo ruby setup.rb install

% documentation %
http://rubydoc.info/github/rkh/mixico/master/file/README

% source code %
mixico is written in c.  it is very quick (basically atomic.)

it is released under an MIT license. see COPYING.

% the long of it %
this is just a small bit of code and it has yet to prove itself, but
i believe this discovery could spawn a small following.  i assure you:
it is practical.

while mining through the ftp site of the recently departed guy decoux,
an exquisite french hacker, i read of a lost module for reparenting 
modules in different directions.  this 'prop' extension is most heavily
elucidated in a thread beginning with [ruby-talk:20293].  the extension
itself is vanished, so we are left with a sort example and a diagram.

the diagram appears in a reply to hal fulton (who asks where this
'insert' method is that guy is using between modules):

from [ruby-talk:20296]:

  >>>>> "H" == Hal E Fulton <hal9000 / hypermetrics.com> writes:
  
  H> What is "insert" anyway? Did you mean "include"
  H> or did I miss something?
  
   No, this not "include" but really "insert" (i.e. another way)
  
   For 2 classes A < B you have
  
  
                     extend put the class here
                               |
                               |
                               |
                               v
                    meta-A <========= meta-B
                      ^                  ^
      insert put      |                  |
      the class ====> |                  |
      here            |                  |
                      A    <=========    B
                               ^
                               |
                               |
                      include put the class here
  
   You have method specifics to the metaclass

even if we had the code for 'prop', we wouldn't be able to build
it.  these messages date back to 25 aug 2001, when ruby 1.6.4 was
current.

i began trying to recreate this intriguing work by trying to get
guy's example code to work.  while i've not yet completed that work,
i stumbled upon another idea.

when a module is mixed into an object, the module itself appears
to be in the inheritance chain (Module.ancestors):

  module Mixin; end
  
  class GuineaPig; end

  sylvain = GuineaPig.new
  sylvain.extend Mixin
  class << sylvain
    p ancestors
  end

the printed list for test subject 'sylvain' is:
[Mixin, GuineaPig, Object, Kernel]

this means 'sylvain' will respond to methods in the Mixin module
first, then in the GuineaPig class and so on up.  however, the
Mixin module isn't REALLY in the inheritance chain.  ruby creates
an object of type T_ICLASS that is a proxy class.  a symbolic link
to the Mixin module.

  sylvain ==> #<Mixin> ==> GuineaPig ==> Object ==> Kernel

the #<Mixin> object is useless in actual Ruby.  you can't print it out.
it doesn't have any methods.  you can pass it around in a variable, but
that's it.

again, it's a symbolic link to the Mixin module and its superclass is
GuineaPig.  one of these objects is created every time you mixin.

on to this:

  require 'mixico'

so, mixico adds two methods: disable_mixin and enable_mixin.

  class << sylvain
    @m = disable_mixin Mixin
    p ancestors
  end

which prints: [GuineaPig, Object, Kernel]
  
  class << sylvain
    enable_mixin @m
    p ancestors
  end

which prints: [Mixin, GuineaPig, Object, Kernel]

% how is this practical? %

my immediate concern is to stop using instance_eval.  i use it in
markaby a lot.  and it gets used once in shoes.

instance_eval can help give you syntax like this:

  Markaby.html do
    head do
      title "feral cat colonies worldwide"
      meta :name => "ROBOTS", :content => "ALL"
    end
  end

nice, readable tags, right?

it's nice because instance_eval redirects all your methods inside
the block to a specific object.  the problem is that it alters `self`
and redirects instance and class variables as well.

if you've got an instance variable you want to use inside the block,
you need to save it in a local variable before entering the block.
same with `self`.

  def to_html
    obj = self
    Markaby.html do
      head do
        title obj.friendly_title
        meta :name => "ROBOTS", :content => "ALL"
      end
    end
  end

this is annoying to remember.  it's often the source of bugs.

mixico, on the other hand, can be used to redirect the methods
without changing `self` and swallowing up the ivars.

  module Mixin
    def head ...
    def title ...
    def meta ...
  end

we you enable the mixin with mixico, it'll send the methods through
the proxy class.  and when you disable it, you're back to normal.
no sign of the mixin at all.

% maintenance %
Until _why might reappear someday, this project is maintained by Konstantin Haase (rkh).
konstantin.mailinglists <at> googlemail <dot> com
http://github.com/rkh/mixico
* updated for Ruby 1.9 + other changes by banisterfiend
http://github.com/banister
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.