mixin hijinks — enable and disable mixins
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Name already in use
A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
Failed to load latest commit information.
Latest commit message
% mixico % disable and re-enable mixins for ruby. % quick summary % there's no way i'm keeping this short. i'm sorry, but you're going to have to really read this once. % installation % with gem: $ gem install mixico without: $ ruby setup.rb config $ ruby setup.rb setup $ sudo ruby setup.rb install % documentation % http://rubydoc.info/github/rkh/mixico/master/file/README % source code % mixico is written in c. it is very quick (basically atomic.) it is released under an MIT license. see COPYING. % the long of it % this is just a small bit of code and it has yet to prove itself, but i believe this discovery could spawn a small following. i assure you: it is practical. while mining through the ftp site of the recently departed guy decoux, an exquisite french hacker, i read of a lost module for reparenting modules in different directions. this 'prop' extension is most heavily elucidated in a thread beginning with [ruby-talk:20293]. the extension itself is vanished, so we are left with a sort example and a diagram. the diagram appears in a reply to hal fulton (who asks where this 'insert' method is that guy is using between modules): from [ruby-talk:20296]: >>>>> "H" == Hal E Fulton <hal9000 / hypermetrics.com> writes: H> What is "insert" anyway? Did you mean "include" H> or did I miss something? No, this not "include" but really "insert" (i.e. another way) For 2 classes A < B you have extend put the class here | | | v meta-A <========= meta-B ^ ^ insert put | | the class ====> | | here | | A <========= B ^ | | include put the class here You have method specifics to the metaclass even if we had the code for 'prop', we wouldn't be able to build it. these messages date back to 25 aug 2001, when ruby 1.6.4 was current. i began trying to recreate this intriguing work by trying to get guy's example code to work. while i've not yet completed that work, i stumbled upon another idea. when a module is mixed into an object, the module itself appears to be in the inheritance chain (Module.ancestors): module Mixin; end class GuineaPig; end sylvain = GuineaPig.new sylvain.extend Mixin class << sylvain p ancestors end the printed list for test subject 'sylvain' is: [Mixin, GuineaPig, Object, Kernel] this means 'sylvain' will respond to methods in the Mixin module first, then in the GuineaPig class and so on up. however, the Mixin module isn't REALLY in the inheritance chain. ruby creates an object of type T_ICLASS that is a proxy class. a symbolic link to the Mixin module. sylvain ==> #<Mixin> ==> GuineaPig ==> Object ==> Kernel the #<Mixin> object is useless in actual Ruby. you can't print it out. it doesn't have any methods. you can pass it around in a variable, but that's it. again, it's a symbolic link to the Mixin module and its superclass is GuineaPig. one of these objects is created every time you mixin. on to this: require 'mixico' so, mixico adds two methods: disable_mixin and enable_mixin. class << sylvain @m = disable_mixin Mixin p ancestors end which prints: [GuineaPig, Object, Kernel] class << sylvain enable_mixin @m p ancestors end which prints: [Mixin, GuineaPig, Object, Kernel] % how is this practical? % my immediate concern is to stop using instance_eval. i use it in markaby a lot. and it gets used once in shoes. instance_eval can help give you syntax like this: Markaby.html do head do title "feral cat colonies worldwide" meta :name => "ROBOTS", :content => "ALL" end end nice, readable tags, right? it's nice because instance_eval redirects all your methods inside the block to a specific object. the problem is that it alters `self` and redirects instance and class variables as well. if you've got an instance variable you want to use inside the block, you need to save it in a local variable before entering the block. same with `self`. def to_html obj = self Markaby.html do head do title obj.friendly_title meta :name => "ROBOTS", :content => "ALL" end end end this is annoying to remember. it's often the source of bugs. mixico, on the other hand, can be used to redirect the methods without changing `self` and swallowing up the ivars. module Mixin def head ... def title ... def meta ... end we you enable the mixin with mixico, it'll send the methods through the proxy class. and when you disable it, you're back to normal. no sign of the mixin at all. % maintenance % Until _why might reappear someday, this project is maintained by Konstantin Haase (rkh). konstantin.mailinglists <at> googlemail <dot> com http://github.com/rkh/mixico * updated for Ruby 1.9 + other changes by banisterfiend http://github.com/banister
mixin hijinks — enable and disable mixins
No releases published
No packages published