-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rockylinux:9 image missing /sbin/init or /usr/sbin/init #39
Comments
This was broken seemingly by accident, without any upstream updates as of yet. Since we are also testing rhel9 this seems like a "nice to have" and we can re-enable the test once the upstream issue is fixed. See rocky-linux/sig-cloud-instance-images#39
…nit (#367) This was broken seemingly by accident, without any upstream updates as of yet. Since we are also testing rhel9 this seems like a "nice to have" and we can re-enable the test once the upstream issue is fixed. See rocky-linux/sig-cloud-instance-images#39
Hi - I apologize for the extreme latency on responding to this issue. I will investigate adding the init binary to the container in 8.8. It was removed while building the 8.7 images due to systemd polluting the build root and init not being actually a necessary component for most container users, due to container philosophy of running a single thing in a container. We recognize that users do need/want init containers, and so I would recommend users who need init available use the We also have a PR open to add ubi-micro and ubi-init variants, the latter of which would automatically have init set as an entrypoint. #42 |
The latest version of rockylinux:9 image is missing /sbin/init (or /usr/sbin/init). Therefore the "Systemd integration" instructions do not work with the latest image version. See: https://hub.docker.com/r/rockylinux/rockylinux
I am aware that the official image is at https://hub.docker.com/_/rockylinux, I'm just linking to the systemd integration section in the link above.
This issue was found on Dec. 21, 2022. The Dec. 17 version of the rockylinux:9 image worked fine and has this file.
@NeilHanlon
Thank you for looking into this possible regression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: