Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) ---- Hello Murray: Many thanks for your time, review, and in-depth checking. Let's see below: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The glossary lists "OF" and "OCP", but those acronyms are not present in the > document. Removed the terms. Added subDAG instead to comply with Tiru's comment in a parallel thread. > > I had to do some bouncing between documents while reading Section 3. Figure > 1 shows what appear to be five flags, not four, and says "T" is declared in > "position 2", though in the diagram it looks like the third position. If position > numbering is zero-based, that should be made clear (it's not in RFC > 6550 either). Actually it is indicated in RFC 6550, though well hidden, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6550#section-20.14 See also https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpl/rpl.xhtml#dodag-config-option-flags Again, many thanks for your thorough checks, and please let me know if you think I should change/clarify something there. Take care, Pascal
- Loading branch information