Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update auto_request_review.yml #1505

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2024
Merged

Update auto_request_review.yml #1505

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2024

Conversation

MSevey
Copy link
Contributor

@MSevey MSevey commented Jan 25, 2024

Overview

I'm proposing the following updates to the auto review assignments.

  1. Simplifying it down to just a rollkit group
  2. Removing Gabriel, Connor
  3. Removing devops
  4. Add me under .github repos specifically

This should result in:

  1. Every PR being assigned to 3 people
  2. Any PRs touching .github assigning to me and 2 others.

If there are other parts of the code base that we want owners of, so that they always review those PRs, we can duplicate the .github example for those.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated reviewer groups for pull requests to enhance the review process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The change in functionality involves reassigning reviewers to different groups in the project's GitHub Actions configuration. By updating the .github/auto_request_review.yml file, it shifts rollkit from the code-owners reviewer group, removes Manav-Aggarwal and S1nus from the rollkit group, and adds tzdybal, gupadhyaya, tuxcanfly, and MSevey as reviewers. The celestia group has been removed, and the .github/** file pattern now includes MSevey as a reviewer.

Changes

Files Summary of Changes
.github/auto_request_review.yml Reassigned reviewers within groups, updated file patterns

🐇✨
Changes are afoot, oh what a sight,
Moving around with all our might.
From rollkit to code-owners, a leap so bold,
To review with care, stories to be told.
🌟📝

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@MSevey MSevey marked this pull request as draft January 25, 2024 20:21
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2bfbc3 and 8da267a.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
.github/auto_request_review.yml (2)
  • 6-6: Adding Manav-Aggarwal to the code-owners group aligns with the PR's objective to adjust review assignments based on expertise or team changes. Ensure that Manav-Aggarwal is aware of their new responsibilities and has the necessary permissions to review code in the areas covered by the code-owners group.
  • 6-6: The summary mentions Manav-Aggarwal being removed from the rollkit group, which is not directly visible in the provided code. Assuming this change is correctly implemented, it's crucial to update any documentation or internal records that track group memberships and review responsibilities.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d2bfbc3) 50.36% compared to head (9ab263b) 50.36%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1505   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.36%   50.36%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        6731     6731           
=======================================
  Hits         3390     3390           
  Misses       3000     3000           
  Partials      341      341           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MSevey MSevey added the C:ci Component: Continuous Integration label Jan 26, 2024
@MSevey MSevey marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2024 14:42
@MSevey MSevey enabled auto-merge January 26, 2024 14:43
@MSevey MSevey requested review from tuxcanfly, gupadhyaya and Manav-Aggarwal and removed request for Bidon15, jrmanes and smuu January 26, 2024 14:43
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8da267a and 9c7da84.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c7da84 and 9ab263b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/auto_request_review.yml

@MSevey MSevey added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 109de72 Jan 27, 2024
19 checks passed
@MSevey MSevey deleted the MSevey-patch-1 branch January 27, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:ci Component: Continuous Integration
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants