Status rpc

[gupadhyaya]

TestStatus is updated to use the new default (false, after the ibc support) for SyncInfo.CatchingUp field.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced testing for node synchronization, validation, and general information.
  • Introduced specific tests for network address, network type, and RPC address within node information.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update focuses on enhancing the testing framework for a node's SyncInfo, ValidatorInfo, and NodeInfo by refining the assertions related to these components and organizing them into separate test runs. Additionally, it introduces new assertions for ListenAddr, Network, and RPCAddress within NodeInfo, aiming to improve the robustness and clarity of the tests.

Changes

Files	Change Summaries
node/.../full_client_test.go	- Updated assertions for SyncInfo, ValidatorInfo, NodeInfo - Refactored checks into separate test runs - Added assertions for ListenAddr, Network, RPCAddress

Poem

🐇💻 A rabbit hopped through the code, with care,
🌟 Updating tests with flair everywhere.
"Let's check SyncInfo, and Validator too,
🛠️ And don't forget NodeInfo, there's more to do!"
With ListenAddr, Network, RPC in sight,
🎉 Ensuring each node dances just right.
"To improved tests, we leap!" was the cheer,
🚀 For quality code, the goal is clear.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c9d8467) 50.23% compared to head (afd11ec) 52.09%.
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
block/manager.go	68.75%	10 Missing ⚠️
types/utils.go	64.70%	6 Missing ⚠️
node/full.go	66.66%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
node/full_client.go	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
types/abci/block.go	91.66%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1547      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   50.23%   52.09%   +1.85%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        6762     5515    -1247     
==========================================
- Hits         3397     2873     -524     
+ Misses       3024     2316     -708     
+ Partials      341      326      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 013a055 and afd11ec.

Files selected for processing (1)

• node/full_client_test.go (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

node/full_client_test.go (2)

• 979-991: The test case for SyncInfo correctly asserts the new default behavior of the SyncInfo.CatchingUp field as false. This aligns with the PR objectives and ensures that the synchronization status logic is updated as expected.
• 993-997: The test case for ValidatorInfo correctly asserts the validator's address, public key, and voting power. This ensures that the validator information is accurately represented and tested.