Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: document how to have StorageClass consume Rados Namespace (backport #14173) #14242

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

docs: document how to have StorageClass consume Rados Namespace (backport #14173) #14242

merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented May 20, 2024

description

This change expands the documentation to describe how to create a storageclass that consumes a CephBlockPoolRadodNamespace.

Issue resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #13214

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
  • Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next minor release.
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #14173 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@obnoxxx @mergify
docs: document how to have StorageClass consume Rados Namespace
98732a5 
closes: #13214

Co-authored-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Blaine Gardner <b.blaine.gardner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8e7ac95)
@travisn travisn merged commit 4b97f98 into release-1.14 May 20, 2024
20 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/release-1.14/pr-14173 branch May 20, 2024 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@travisn travisn travisn approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@travisn @obnoxxx