-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RF] Documentation Changes requested by @guitargeek for the "RooFit AD Support" doc #14018
[RF] Documentation Changes requested by @guitargeek for the "RooFit AD Support" doc #14018
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Thanks @guitargeek ,
|
@guitargeek ping. Is there anything else to be done here? |
a7c9a45
to
250498d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for implementing the suggestions and addressing the comments!
I have reorganized the commit message a bit with an improved commit massage for your commit, and added some other commits with general documentation and code improvements to be merged together when the CI is green.
@phsft-bot build |
Starting build on |
These changes are on top of the first draft that I submitted, that was merged as part of [PR13929}(root-project#13929). The requested changes can be tracked in my personal drafts repo [here](https://github.com/QuillPusher/QP_Drafts/pull/3). Changes: - RooFit intro before AD support -> already covered in "Overview on RooFit implementation details..." section by @guitargeek - **Extracting free functions** to a separate header file is **optional**, re-wrote it as one of the two currently recommended approaches - changed to "Support **Code Generation**" instead of "AD Support" in most places - minor formatting and spelling errors changed - added fully qualified function names in some places for better Doxygen rendering - Removed random commit IDs and added branch name to repo links
The `RooUnitTest` is not meant to be part of the public user inferface, it is only used for internal tests.
Most importantly, specify what "RooFit" should link to in some cases: the main RooFit documentation instead of the namespace documentation.
250498d
to
400f88d
Compare
@phsft-bot build |
Starting build on |
Build failed on ROOT-ubuntu2204/nortcxxmod. Warnings:
|
Build failed on ROOT-performance-centos8-multicore/soversion. Warnings:
|
Build failed on ROOT-ubuntu2004/python3. Warnings:
|
400f88d
to
7a06b62
Compare
@phsft-bot build |
Starting build on |
These changes are on top of the first draft that I submitted, that was merged as part of PR13929.
The requested changes can be tracked in my personal drafts repo here.
Changes:
RooFit intro before AD support -> already covered in "Overview on RooFit implementation details..." section by @guitargeek
Extracting free functions to a separate header file is optional, re-wrote it as one of the two currently recommended approaches
changed to "Support Code Generation" instead of "AD Support" in most places
minor formatting and spelling errors changed
This Pull request:
Changes or fixes:
Checklist:
This PR fixes #