Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommended scaffolding for spatial packages #362

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 19, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion appendix.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@

## dev

- 2021-11-18, update advice on grouping functions for pkgdown output (#361)
* 2021-11-19, add recommended spatial packages to scaffolding section (software-review-meta#47)

* 2021-11-18, update advice on grouping functions for pkgdown output (#361)

* 2021-11-04, add mentions of stat software review to software review intro and to the first book page (#342).

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions pkg_building.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ rather than one where it is re-exported. For instance many functions in **devtoo

* For parsing, creating, and manipulating XML, we strongly recommend [xml2][] for most cases. [You can refer to Daniel Nüst's notes about migration from XML to xml2](https://gist.github.com/nuest/3ed3b0057713eb4f4d75d11bb62f2d66).

* For spatial data, the [sp][] package should be considered deprecated in favour of [sf][], and the packages [rgdal][], [maptools][], and [rgeos][] will be retired by the end of 2023. We recommend use of the spatial suites developed by the [r-spatial](https://github.com/r-spatial) and [rspatial](https://github.com/rspatial) communities. See [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review-meta/issues/47) for relevant discussions.


## Version Control

Expand Down