Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OmniCore and IRB 1100 support #164

Closed
garyedwards opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

OmniCore and IRB 1100 support #164

garyedwards opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@garyedwards
Copy link

I may be jumping the gun here as I believe it is released this month, but we are in the experimental repo. Has there been any testing of the new OmniCore controller with ROS? I contacted my local ABB support who had not head of ROS but suggested it can run the same rapid code as older larger models. We are looking at procuring a small / mobile robot at the moment and it would be great to understand if this is likely to be supported.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

I'm not aware of any work towards OmniCore support specifically.

Perhaps @jontje can say something about the compatibility of existing RAPID code (and thus the driver) with the new controller infrastructure.

@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn transferred this issue from ros-industrial/abb_experimental Jan 11, 2019
@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

I've also transferred this to the main repository as the driver you're referring to is hosted here.

@jontje
Copy link

jontje commented Jan 14, 2019

Perhaps @jontje can say something about the compatibility of existing RAPID code (and thus the driver) with the new controller infrastructure.

I am not aware of any major change in the RAPID language for RobotWare 7, and I would be a bit surprised if it would require a big effort to get the current RAPID code, and driver, to work with the new controller.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

@garyedwards: as the new controllers haven't really been released yet, we can't really act on this right now. In addition, according to @jontje, the new controller should be fully bw-compatible, so the assumption right now would be that abb_driver "just works".

Based on this I'm closing this issue as I believe @jontje answered your question.

If it turns out the driver doesn't work and we need to change something -- as far as we don't all migrate to abb_libegm and abb_librws -- we can re-open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants