New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove grasp service support from pick_place's fillGrasp #328
remove grasp service support from pick_place's fillGrasp #328
Conversation
As you've pointed out, there's not much value here with this single default grasp. Would we rather have this Long term: we need a default grasping service, even if its pretty basic. |
@@ -576,7 +472,6 @@ void move_group::MoveGroupPickPlaceAction::fillGrasps(moveit_msgs::PickupGoal &g | |||
-std::numeric_limits<double>::max()); | |||
} | |||
goal.possible_grasps.push_back(g); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm pretty sure this section needs to be un-indented, but all my clang-format efforts have failed me since Travis didn't run
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You were right, I just changed that to trigger the check...
For some reason my clang-format (3.9) keeps reordering my list of includes alphabetically,
so I don't use it at the moment...
If you have an idea how to change that, that would be nice :-)
Actually, I do think the one default grasp is enough for this interface. (We could add more if someone provides reasonable grasps). |
Think you could write up a quick tutorial on using grasping services and its integration to moveit? You or I could also then add a table with available open source grasp planning packages to that tutorial |
7a15839
to
57a3eba
Compare
Not sure I'll have time for that in the near future, but it sounds like a good idea.
I'm pretty interested in such a list myself. I'm only aware of your |
57a3eba
to
b359aa4
Compare
The combination of the service support here and an optional hard-coded default grasp is problematic because if the service is not available for any reason, but should be called, the pick-request will end up with the hard-coded grasp. This can create unexpected trajectories. With MoveGroupInterface::planGraspsAndPick, a replacement for the removed functionality is available. This removes the dependencies on manipulation_msgs and household_objects_database_msgs. (These were not even consistently specified in package.xml and CMakeLists.txt)
Thanks! The tutorial need only take 10 minutes of quick notes so that we have something started for the future... |
The combination of the service support here and an optional hard-coded default grasp
is problematic because if the service is not available for any reason, but should be called,
the pick-request will end up with the hard-coded grasp.
This can create unexpected trajectories.
With MoveGroupInterface::planGraspsAndPick, a replacement for the removed functionality
is available.
This removes the dependencies on manipulation_msgs and household_objects_database_msgs.
(These were not even consistently specified in package.xml and CMakeLists.txt)
Should not be back-ported to retain current behavior.