Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move background_processing #997

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tylerjw
Copy link
Member

@tylerjw tylerjw commented Jan 17, 2022

Description

background_processing is only used in one place (the rviz plugin), it is not a core feature of moveit and adds boost dependencies we'd like removed from moveit.

Long term the functionality of background_processing could be refactored to use features from the stdlib or replaced with async. In the short term though this is a nice reduction of code in moveit_core that doesn't belong in moveit_core.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #997 (38baab6) into main (5073795) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #997   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.96%   57.96%           
=======================================
  Files         309      309           
  Lines       26120    26120           
=======================================
  Hits        15138    15138           
  Misses      10982    10982           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5073795...38baab6. Read the comment docs.

@tylerjw tylerjw merged commit 77cb1da into moveit:main Jan 18, 2022
@tylerjw tylerjw deleted the move_background_processing branch February 1, 2022 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants