We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following comments are from the source code navigation/map_server/src/image_loader.cpp, branch: indigo-devel
137 // If negate is true, we consider blacker pixels free, and whiter 138 // pixels free. Otherwise, it's vice versa
It seems that there is a typo. The suggested correction is as follows:
137 // If negate is true, we consider blacker pixels free, and whiter 138 // pixels occupied. Otherwise, it's vice versa
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closes ros-planning#625
4cdb62f
Closes #625 (#627)
daf955e
No branches or pull requests
The following comments are from the source code navigation/map_server/src/image_loader.cpp, branch: indigo-devel
137 // If negate is true, we consider blacker pixels free, and whiter
138 // pixels free. Otherwise, it's vice versa
It seems that there is a typo. The suggested correction is as follows:
137 // If negate is true, we consider blacker pixels free, and whiter
138 // pixels occupied. Otherwise, it's vice versa
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: