Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No smach_viewer.py in ROS Hydro Debs? #6

Closed
pirobot opened this issue Feb 14, 2014 · 7 comments · Fixed by ros/rosdistro#3110
Closed

No smach_viewer.py in ROS Hydro Debs? #6

pirobot opened this issue Feb 14, 2014 · 7 comments · Fixed by ros/rosdistro#3110

Comments

@pirobot
Copy link

pirobot commented Feb 14, 2014

It seems the smach_viewer.py script did not make it into the Hydro Debian packages under Ubuntu 12.04. Was that an oversight? Or is it no longer compatible?

@jbohren
Copy link
Member

jbohren commented Feb 14, 2014

That's really strange... I definitely released it a while ago.

It's in rosdistro: https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/16b8e6fef96c5aa6d971783bd314a7fd29db095b/hydro/distribution.yaml#L905
But it's not listed on the debbuild page: http://www.ros.org/debbuild/hydro.html

@tfoote Do you know what the deal is with this?

@tfoote
Copy link
Contributor

tfoote commented Feb 14, 2014

It needs a version in the rosdistro file to be considered released.

@jbohren
Copy link
Member

jbohren commented Feb 14, 2014

Ok, I've added a PR to add the missing version. Sorry for leaving that out 8 months ago.

@pirobot
Copy link
Author

pirobot commented Feb 14, 2014

Gracias!

@jbohren
Copy link
Member

jbohren commented Feb 27, 2014

To follow up, smach_viewer deb is now in the public repos.

@pirobot
Copy link
Author

pirobot commented Mar 17, 2014

Confirmed. Now installs with 'sudo apt-get install ros-hydro-smach-viewer'.

@jbohren
Copy link
Member

jbohren commented Mar 17, 2014

Finally.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants