Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow qt plugins to specify a preference for relative positioning #23

Open
scpeters opened this issue Jul 27, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Allow qt plugins to specify a preference for relative positioning #23

scpeters opened this issue Jul 27, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@scpeters
Copy link

When plotting multiple topics in rxplot, each topic would be displayed in its own vertically-stacked subplot. Here's an example from a drcsim tutorial.
GitHub Logo

Based on the discussion of rqt_common_plugins issue 86, I was able to plot topics in separate subplots using rqt_plot, but they are tiled horizontally rather than vertically.

It's nice to have plots stacked vertically, so their timelines are aligned. More generally, it would be nice if rqt plugins could specify a preferred relative position.

@ablasdel
Copy link

@DorianScholz Any ideas on how much work this might be?

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Contributor

I will add an option to make this possible via the command line. I am not yet sure if it should/could also be exposed in the plugin api.

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Contributor

I prepared a patch on the branch orientation but the result is not yet great. It does work reliable for multiple dock widgets since restoreState seems to overwrite the orientation.

I filled a ticket at https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32749 - lets see what the response on this will be.

@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas removed their assignment Jan 23, 2017
@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Contributor

In the meantime the ticket has been moved but the problem is still the same with newer Qt versions: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-32749

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants