Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Included get_available_rmw_implementations #517

Merged

Conversation

ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde commented Feb 27, 2020

As discussed in these PRs ros2/ros2cli#460, ros2/rmw_implementation#85 and ros2/rmw_implementation#84 I included in rclpy the utility function get_available_rmw_implementations()

@ahcorde ahcorde added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 27, 2020
@ahcorde ahcorde self-assigned this Feb 27, 2020
Signed-off-by: ahcorde <ahcorde@gmail.com>
@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahcorde commented Mar 3, 2020

Testing


  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status
  • Windows-container Build Status

Unrelated test failures. Merging

@ahcorde ahcorde merged commit 2b04110 into master Mar 3, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the ahcorde/feature/added_get_available_rmw_implementations branch March 3, 2020 09:43
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
from rclpy.constants import S_TO_NS
from rclpy.context import Context

import ament_index_python
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

flake8 is showing a failure, because this isn't imported in the correct order (the failure didn't appear in CI because rclpy was missing in the packages to be tested). @ahcorde Can you send a PR correcting it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants