Add the "issuer fingerprint" subpacket type #3026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This subpacket is an alternative to the "issuer keyid" subpacket. It contains the pubkey version plus the complete fingerprint.
|
Yeah it'd be good to get rid of this stuff. There will be a soname bump for 6.0 so there's the next chance (so, basically just now), it's not like anything besides rpm itself is likely to use this silly API. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This subpacket is an alternative to the "issuer keyid" subpacket. It contains the pubkey version plus the complete fingerprint.
I would prefer to drop all the subpacket definitions from the rpm code, as rpm has no business dealing with subpackets. Unfortunately
pgpValString(PGPVAL_SUBTYPE, val)is in the public API...