Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

what's the utility of the BAD_CTE_7BIT check? #1590

Closed
2 of 11 tasks
fauno opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed
2 of 11 tasks

what's the utility of the BAD_CTE_7BIT check? #1590

fauno opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@fauno
Copy link

fauno commented Apr 13, 2017

Classification (Please choose one option):

  • [] Crash/Hang/Data loss
  • WebUI/Usability
  • Serious bug
  • Other bug
  • Feature
  • Enhancement

Reproducibility (Please choose one option):

  • Always
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Unable
  • I didn’t try
  • Not applicable

Rspamd version:

1.5.3

Operation system, CPU, memory and environment:

Parabola GNU/Linux-libre

Description (Please provide a descriptive summary of the issue):

While helping loomio debug why some of their email notifications are being classified as spam by rspamd, I found multipart emails with mixed Content-Transfer-Encoding headers are given 3 points for BAD_CTE_7BIT. For instance, main CTE is set as 7bit and also the text/plain part, but the text/html is quoted-printable. I don't understand much C but I think it's because of the mixed CTE headers? If that's so, I looked for some github notifications with non-ascii characters and I found they were also given this score because of main CTE 7bit and both parts being quoted-printable. Is this a bad practice on their side? I couldn't find any recommendation otherwise (I don't know the proper RFCs)

References:

Compile errors (if any):

Steps to reproduce:

Look for Content-Transfer-Encoding and X-Spamd-Result headers

Expected results:

Actual results:

Debugging information (see details here):

Configuration:

Stock configuration

Additional information:

@gdpelican
Copy link

@vstakhov Can this be considered resolved with the new commits? What was the issue to begin with?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 25, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Mar 25, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants