README uses expect() syntax

[banyan]

In the future, we plan to change the defaults so that only expect is available unless you explicitly enable should.

http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2012/06/rspecs-new-expectation-syntax

If this plan is progressing, README should use expect syntax for rspec newbie. WDYT?
Thanks.

[alindeman]

Yes! Thank you for doing this.

[banyan]

@alindeman

Thanks for quick response!!
And I have one more question.

Today I was asked by my colleague, and he said
"Which is better to use, should syntax or expect syntax? This documentation (https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/docs/gettingstarted) seems to me to use should syntax."

So my question is, is there any way to fix (or pull request) relish's documentation?

[myronmarston]

We just haven't gotten around to updating it. Want to take a stab at it?

[banyan]

Yes! I'll do it if I can!

[stephenmckinney]

👍 I've fielded similar questions from RSpec newbies