-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Creating rspec-its gem for rspec-core issue #1083 #1
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
|
|||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's this file for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was keeping track of some things I wanted to bring up with you, but I ended up answering them all myself prior to the last commit. I'll get rid of it and use github mechanisms going forward.
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
--color |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should also run the rspec repo's with --order rand
and --warnings
Don't mean to press, guys, but wanted to make sure you'd seen #1 (comment) If you don't know what to do about it off hand, let me know and I'll dig into it. |
I've been getitng the following warning when I run the rspec examples: /Users/palfvin/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p247/lib/ruby/2.0.0/openssl/ssl.rb:101: warning: assigned but unused variable - id and I'm also getting three warnings about rspec-core redefining constants that are previously defined in rspec-expectations. You can see them at https://travis-ci.org/palfvin/rspec-its/jobs/11993819 Are those anything I need to worry about? |
The openssl warnings are, afaik, something we can't do anything about. I've looked at them before. The redefining constants warnings might be fixable, but they're not anything to worry about. |
matrix: | ||
allow_failures: | ||
- rvm: rbx-19mode | ||
- rvm: rbx-18mode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still an incorrect line ending here ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for persisting. ;-) Turns out I didn't realize glob
didn't handle .
files. Then I realized I didn't really understand how to match an empty string. Anyway, next commit will be "clean" in this respect.
Looks good to me, I left a few more notes but they're mostly about formatting. |
Looks good...merge away whenever you want to :). |
Creating rspec-its gem for rspec-core issue #1083
Sorry for displaying yet more naivete, but what are the next steps for publishing this to rubygems? I see that there's a version of rspec_collection-matchers out there, but it's got a lot of oddities, including:
And do you want me to go ahead and submit the pull request for the 3.0 extraction or do you want to get the rubygems things squared aware first? |
@palfvin that will be myron just place holdering the gem, you can start on the PR for extraction and Myron will sort the gem deployment out with you at some point. Note I like to check that this sort of thing works in the following way, create some specs in an empty gemset that follow this pattern. It's ok to do this manually.
|
Submitted for code review.