Distinguish between the original method and a method missing proc. #954
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before, we would return a proc that invokes `method_missing` from `original_method`, but it wasn’t a `Method` object and couldn’t be bound, leading to `NoMethodError` in an edge case. Fixes #951.
|
Got this green on travis. Anyone want to review it, @rspec/rspec ? |
|
Looks good to me |
myronmarston
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2015
Distinguish between the original method and a method missing proc.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before, we would return a proc that invokes
method_missingfrom
original_method, but it wasn’t aMethodobjectand couldn’t be bound, leading to
NoMethodErrorin anedge case.
Fixes #951.