You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't seen this request, but maybe I didn't look carefully enough: I tried to make a question where several answers are considered correct, and the behaviour I obtained was that the only correct solution was to check all correct answers. My intention was that it would be considered correct if at least one of the correct answers was checked (and none of the wrong answers).
For instance:
question("Select at least one TRUE expression",
answer("`2 < 4`", correct = TRUE, message = "`!FALSE` is also correct"),
answer("`!FALSE`", correct = TRUE, message = "`2 < 4` is also correct"),
answer("`TRUE & (2 < 1)`"),
allow_retry = TRUE
)
Selecting only one of the correct answers is considered wrong. What would be nice is an any_correct option that would result in the desired behaviour.
A related feature would be to allow multiple choice square check boxes even when only one answer is correct, in order to avoid giving the hint that only one answer is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
elmstedt
added a commit
to elmstedt/learnr
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
I haven't seen this request, but maybe I didn't look carefully enough: I tried to make a
question
where several answers are considered correct, and the behaviour I obtained was that the only correct solution was to check all correct answers. My intention was that it would be considered correct if at least one of the correct answers was checked (and none of the wrong answers).For instance:
Selecting only one of the correct answers is considered wrong. What would be nice is an
any_correct
option that would result in the desired behaviour.A related feature would be to allow multiple choice square check boxes even when only one answer is correct, in order to avoid giving the hint that only one answer is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: