-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix JSS template by pinning the version of latexrelease package #337
Conversation
36f461d By pining the latexrelease package to older version (https://topanswers.xyz/tex?q=1416)
So the fix indeed work for the branch : https://travis-ci.org/github/rstudio/rticles/builds/736422869 That is good to know we can pin some packages waiting for fixes upstream. I think doing that is enough and we don't need to pin the TinyTeX binary version. What do you think ? I guess the other workflow will suceed, it is just long to run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I'll revert 1054e2b and merge this one. We should also notify JSS editors about this.
Do you have a specific contact or should we write to https://www.jstatsoft.org/about/contact ? |
And maybe we need to cache again... 😞 Other idea: maybe we should build a binary specific from rticles testing ? |
Just write to that email.
Let's try to figure out which packages are necessary (calculate the |
OK I'll do that ! Thanks ! |
We really need a way to install packages in TeX Live like the mechanism of R's |
Oh yes that would be great. I have thought about it but I did not look into that yet as you said you would. That would solve issue with CI and latex dependencies for sure. |
I've asked them and unfortunately the answer is no, but one of them said this was an interesting idea. |
Oh too bad ! Thanks for asking. That prevent me for spending some time on this question. Glad they find that interesting ! We may see that appear one day then. For now, we will do without. |
This reverts commit 13c7d68 as now it has be fixed upstream in jss.cls
Same fix as in 36f461d by pining the latexrelease package to older version (https://topanswers.xyz/tex?q=1416)
This should close #329 and fix the travis build #335 (comment)
let's see what travis think of that