Incorrect Javascript switch case indentation

[JaapJoris]

There are conflicting opinions about the correct way to indent the switch statement. On the one hand, there is the "old-fashioned" way, recommended by the Crockford Conventions and ESLint:

switch (foo) {
case bar:
    if (baz) {
        switch (foo) {
        case bar:
            if (baz) {
                xizzy();
            }
        }
    }
}

On the other hand, there is the "modern" way, recommended by MDN, and also preferred by most people I asked:

switch (foo) {
    case bar:
        if (baz) {
            switch (foo) {
                case bar:
                    if (baz) {
                        xizzy();
                    }
             }
        }
}

While this example illustrates that the "old-fashioned" way may not be so bad after all, DjHTML currently attempts to indent the "modern" way, and since most people prefer that we should keep it that way. However, it fails spectacularly on this particular example:

switch (foo) {
    case bar:
        if (baz) {
            switch (foo) {
            case bar:
                if (baz) {
                    xizzy();
                }
            }
}
}

I'm hoping to come up with a more generic solution involving offsets that can also solve #50, #59, and #74. Stay tuned!

[JaapJoris]

By the way, my personal preference would actually be this non-standard way:

switch (foo) {
    case bar:
    if (baz) {
        switch (foo) {
            case bar:
            if (baz) {
                xizzy();
            }
        }
    }
}

This makes sense because the case statements are actually a special case of labels, and labels should never be indented. Oh well.