Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix #12687] Fix a false positive for Lint/Void #12688

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

koic
Copy link
Member

@koic koic commented Feb 15, 2024

Fixes #12687.

This PR fixes a false positive for Lint/Void when each block with conditional expressions that has multiple statements.


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Ran bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and runs RuboCop on its own code.
  • Added an entry (file) to the changelog folder named {change_type}_{change_description}.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format for details.

Fixes rubocop#12687.

This PR fixes a false positive for `Lint/Void` when
`each` block with conditional expressions that has multiple statements.
@@ -614,6 +614,18 @@ def foo=(rhs)
RUBY
end

it 'does not register `#each` block with conditional expressions that has multiple statements' do
expect_no_offenses(<<~RUBY)
enumerator_as_filter.each do |item|
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Won't this be different for this different enumerators, though? Maybe some Allowed list would make more sense than just assuming that multiple expressions are OK all the time.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Initially, I also considered Allowed list approach, but it appears that the issue was simply that the following logic for on_block was not accounted for in the implementation of on_begin.
https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop/blob/v1.60.2/lib/rubocop/cop/lint/void.rb#L86

So, I think this approach could provide a more generic solution instead of Allowed list.

@bbatsov bbatsov merged commit d4afee6 into rubocop:master Feb 15, 2024
32 checks passed
@koic koic deleted the fix_false_positive_for_lint_void branch February 15, 2024 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lint/Void false positive and unsafe autocorrect
2 participants