Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error Updating Under Win 10 x64 #122

Closed
tajmone opened this issue Dec 25, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #124
Closed

Error Updating Under Win 10 x64 #122

tajmone opened this issue Dec 25, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #124

Comments

@tajmone
Copy link

tajmone commented Dec 25, 2018

(hopefully not a duplicate #118 and #119, since this is make-related error)

ruby 2.5.3p105 (2018-10-18 revision 65156) [x64-mingw32]

When I try to update the gem under Win 10 x64 I get this error:

current directory: C:/tools/ruby25/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/bigdecimal-1.4.1/ext/bigdecimal/util
C:/tools/ruby25/bin/ruby.exe -r ./siteconf20181225-9440-zwbdav.rb extconf.rb
checking for Windows... yes
creating Makefile

current directory: C:/tools/ruby25/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/bigdecimal-1.4.1/ext/bigdecimal/util
make "DESTDIR=" clean
bash.exe: warning: could not find /tmp, please create!

current directory: C:/tools/ruby25/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/bigdecimal-1.4.1/ext/bigdecimal/util
make "DESTDIR="
generating util-x64-mingw32.def
bash.exe: warning: could not find /tmp, please create!
compiling util.c
linking shared-object bigdecimal/util.so
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc.exe: error: C:/tools/ruby25/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/bigdecimal-1.4.1/tmp/x64-mingw32/bigdecimal/2.5.3/bigdecimal.so: No such file or directory
make: *** [Makefile:259: util.so] Error 1

make failed, exit code 2
@mrkn
Copy link
Member

mrkn commented Dec 25, 2018

This is not a duplicate of #118 and #119.

@mrkn mrkn mentioned this issue Dec 25, 2018
3 tasks
@mrkn mrkn closed this as completed in #124 Dec 26, 2018
mrkn added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2018
Fix install on mingw32.
This fixes #122.
@mrkn
Copy link
Member

mrkn commented Dec 26, 2018

@tajmone Please use version 1.4.2.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants