Deprecate RubyLex and warn about referencing to it #692
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
tompng
reviewed
Aug 23, 2023
`RubyLex` has always been a private component of IRB, so we should explicitly discourage usages of it. Also, it should be placed under the `IRB` module like other components.
tompng
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2023
matzbot
pushed a commit
to ruby/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
(ruby/irb#692) `RubyLex` has always been a private component of IRB, so we should explicitly discourage usages of it. Also, it should be placed under the `IRB` module like other components. ruby/irb@069b5625f7
|
The test has been failing on this CI: http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-repeat50@ruby-sp2-docker/4695983 |
|
@k0kubun sorry that I didn't notice it. I've merged @peterzhu2118's fix. |
|
Thanks both! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RubyLexhas always been a private component of IRB, so we should explicitly discourage usages of it.Also, it should be placed under the
IRBmodule like other components.(It'd be easier to review by ignoring whitespaces with this link)